Factors Influencing the Implementation of a New Pharmacist Prescribing Service in Community Pharmacies.

The pharmacist prescribing service was legally permitted in 2019 in Switzerland to face challenges in the health system; however, there has been a lack of implementation. The aims of this study were to identify implementation factors and to evaluate pharmacy association interventions that aim to support implementation. A qualitative study with two methods was carried out: (1) twelve semi-structured interviews with community pharmacists were recorded, transcribed, and a thematic analysis was carried out using the Consolidated Framework of Implementation Research (CFIR); (2) questionnaires were submitted to the six pharmacy associations of French-speaking Switzerland. The main barriers found were non-reimbursement by health insurance companies, medications' lack of clinical relevance, a negative perception of GPs, and a lack of time. The main facilitators were the availability of service information, pharmacies belonging to chains/groups, a reduction in the medical consultation burden, and the accessibility of pharmacies. Five associations answered, revealing different initiatives supporting implementation, but none of them had strategies at the political level nor communication strategies aimed at patients or GPs. Based on the CFIR, the most frequent implementation factors were highlighted, and this classification facilitates the transposition of the results to other contexts. The results will allow the development of targeted strategies and add the role of the pharmacy associations, which should be considered in future studies.

Evaluation of an enhanced service for medication review with follow up in Swiss community pharmacies: Pre-post study protocol.

BACKGROUND: In Switzerland, 20,000 people are hospitalized each year as result of drug related problems (DRPs). The sources of DRPs can be related to patients' behavior (i.e., wrong administration) or to health processes (i.e., drug-drug interaction). No community pharmacy (CP) service focus on DRPs related to patients' behavior is currently recognized or remunerated in Switzerland. A medication review with follow up (MRF) has been developed to evaluate prescription and non-prescription medication. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the impact of MRF service for the identification and management DRPs associated to patients' behavior and to describe pharmaceutical interventions carried out through MRF. METHODS: A pre-post intervention study with a cluster design and one intervention group will be carried out in CPs in the canton of Vaud (Switzerland) for 15 months. Volunteer pharmacists will be trained on the identification and management of DRPs related to patients' behavior. After training, they will include randomly selected adults taking four or more chronic drugs prescribed for at least three months prior to recruitment. Then, they will conduct three pharmacist-patient face-to-face consultations at 6-month intervals. Tasks will be differentiated by pharmacy technician or pharmacist to triage expired medication or to manage DRPs in a structured manner, respectively. The primary outcome is the identification of DRPs associated to patients' behavior. Secondary outcomes are to assess patients' medication knowledge, number of expired medications, interventions carried out by pharmacists and pharmacists' satisfaction. The study will begin in April 2023 in 19 to 35 pharmacies that will recruit at least 162 patients. A sub analysis will be carried out for patients with 65 years old or over. CONCLUSIONS: The MRF intervention features a training designed for an enhanced evaluation of patient's behavior towards their medication. The study will allow the assessment and management of DRPs in Swiss CPs with the support of the local health authorities and pharmacist association. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov NCT05348538.

Development of self-care in Spanish community pharmacies.

Spain is a European country with over 47.5 million inhabitants and a public National Health System model (i.e., SNS or "Sistema Nacional de Salud") that provides universal coverage to residents and non-residents. The system is funded primarily by general taxes, and it is managed by the 17 regions that have responsibility for the provision and management of healthcare services in their respective territories. The health system recognizes self-care as an important element where individuals have an important role to play in maintaining their own health and preventing illness. In addition, there are non-governmental organizations that promote self-care and provide resources and support to individuals and health professionals. Over 55 thousand pharmacists work in 22,198 community pharmacies distributed throughout the Spanish territory. Pharmacies are the only setting that provide non-prescription medications, which is one of the most used tools for self-care. In addition, they provide a range of Primary Care services to improve patient outcomes and the efficiency of the SNS. This paper includes a description and a classification of the community pharmacy services following the seven pillars of self-care established by the International Self-Care Foundation:-Related to pillars 1 to 4 and 6, Spanish community pharmacists provide health promotion, health education, health information and nutritional assessment.-In relation to pillar 5, the services offered are HIV and syphilis screening, colorectal and cervix cancer screening, SARS-CoV-2 screening test and communication, diabetes, high blood pressure and hypercholesterolemia screening. Regarding the programs for avoiding/stopping drug use: methadone supply, syringe exchange and smoking cessation. Another important service is immunization. Spanish community pharmacists are not legally allowed to vaccinate; however, they contribute through education, or vaccines supply, among others.-For the pillar 7, community pharmacists provide services such as a minor ailment service, an adherence service or a network to actively monitor medication safety (sentinel pharmacies).-Many of the pharmacy services related to self-care have been defined and classified at a national level; however, not all community pharmacies provide them while only some services are funded by the regional health systems.

Identification of high-risk patients for referral through machine learning assisting the decision making to manage minor ailments in community pharmacies.

Background: Data analysis techniques such as machine learning have been used for assisting in triage and the diagnosis of health problems. Nevertheless, it has not been used yet to assist community pharmacists with services such as the Minor Ailment Services These services have been implemented to reduce the burden of primary care consultations in general medical practitioners (GPs) and to allow a better utilization of community pharmacists' skills. However, there is a need to refer high-risk patients to GPs. Aim: To develop a predictive model for high-risk patients that need referral assisting community pharmacists' triage through a minor ailment service. Method: An ongoing pragmatic type 3 effectiveness-implementation hybrid study was undertaken at a national level in Spanish community pharmacies since October 2020. Pharmacists recruited patients presenting with minor ailments and followed them 10 days after the consultation. The main outcome measured was appropriate medical referral (in accordance with previously co-designed protocols). Nine machine learning models were tested (three statistical, three black box and three tree models) to assist pharmacists in the detection of high-risk individuals in need of referral. Results: Over 14'000 patients were included in the study. Most patients were female (68.1%). With no previous treatment for the specific minor ailment (68.0%) presented. A percentage of patients had referral criteria (13.8%) however, not all of these patients were referred by the pharmacist to the GP (8.5%). The pharmacists were using their clinical expertise not to refer these patients. The primary prediction model was the radial support vector machine (RSVM) with an accuracy of 0.934 (CI95 = [0.926,0.942]), Cohen's kappa of 0.630, recall equal to 0.975 and an area under the curve of 0.897. Twenty variables (out of 61 evaluated) were included in the model. radial support vector machine could predict 95.2% of the true negatives and 74.8% of the true positives. When evaluating the performance for the 25 patient's profiles most frequent in the study, the model was considered appropriate for 56% of them. Conclusion: A RSVM model was obtained to assist in the differentiation of patients that can be managed in community pharmacy from those who are at risk and should be evaluated by GPs. This tool potentially increases patients' safety by increasing pharmacists' ability to differentiate minor ailments from other medical conditions.

Documentation of drug related problems and their management in community pharmacy: Data evolution over six years.

BACKGROUND: Documentation of pharmacists' activities, such as drug related problems (DRPs) management, is necessary to estimate fair remuneration but is rarely done in community pharmacies. OBJECTIVE: To document and evaluate the evolution of DRPs prevalence and management over six years. METHODS: Observational study carried out since 2016 in a community pharmacy. Documentation was made yearly for 21 days (depending on seasons, holidays and medical internship rotations) using the ClinPhADoc tool. Pharmacists documented: medication, DRP type, intervention, implied partner and time for DRP management. A subanalysis was made depending on the medical rotation. RESULTS: A total of 171 437 prescriptions were received and 6 844 (4.0%) documented with 1 550 DRPs. Most frequent DRPs were procedural (n = 506, 32.6%), dosage/posology (n = 263, 17.0%) and drug-drug interaction (n = 153, 9.9%). Mean time dedicated to DRP management was 6.9 min, the longest time was for clinical DRPs (11.0 min, SD = 6.6). Most DRPs (n = 726, 44.6%) were managed by the pharmacist alone taking less working time than when involving other stakeholders (p < 0.01). Statistically significant differences were found in DRPs between the beginning and end of medical rotation (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Documentation of DRP management allowed consistent results over the years. Patterns of DRPs can be used to develop inter-professional interventions to prevent DRPs.

Vision and practice of self-care for community pharmacy in Switzerland.

Switzerland is a federal country with a liberal health system built on private mandatory health insurance where the government has three different roles (health protector, guarantor of the offered care and regulator). Health is mostly considered as a responsibility that lies with the individual person. Swiss health policies do not include the term "self-care", although, the federal policy strategy established for this decade (Health2030) includes objectives and lines of action, some of which could be classified as self-care. Swiss policies do not specify the role of health professionals; therefore, it is up to each canton (the terminology used to describe a state of the Swiss Confederation), organization or enterprise to stipulate it. Regarding pharmacists, 1844 community pharmacies (CPs) take care of nearly 260,000 patients each day. The CPs play an important role in self-care that includes activities such as improving patients' health literacy, screening for different health problems, self-medication education or recommendation related to non-prescription medication. The government understands and emphasizes the importance of CPs' role in primary health care to overcome some of the health care system challenges, part of these actions related to self-care. However, there is scope for expansion regarding the role of the CPs in self-care. Nowadays the services and activities related are driven by health authorities (i.e., pharmacists' autonomous prescribing, vaccination, strategy for the prevention of non-communicable diseases or digitization of electronic patients' record), professional pharmacy associations (i.e., netCare® or screening tests), health foundations (i.e., prevention of addiction) and/or private stakeholders such as chain pharmacies (i.e., screening tests). The possibility of including some of these services related to self-care (even when no medication is supplied) as covered services for the mandatory health insurance is currently politically discussed. Long-term actions that also include remuneration, monitoring and quality assurance, or communication/information to public should be considered to support a broader implementation and the sustainability of CPs' services related to self-care.

Clinical relevance and implementation into daily practice of pharmacist-prescribed medication for the management of minor ailments.

Background: Autonomous pharmacist prescribing was legally introduced in Switzerland in 2019 with the reclassification from prescription medication to pharmacist prescribing of 105 medications for sixteen indications. Its aim was to limit medical consultations and healthcare costs. Objectives: To evaluate the clinical relevance of the pharmacy prescribing medications compared to the over-the-counter medications (OTCs) and to evaluate its implementation into daily practice. Methods: A comparison was undertaken by clinical pharmacists to evaluate chemical and galenical equivalences between pharmacy prescribing medications and OTCs using compendium. ch and pharmavista. ch. Then, a scoping review was carried out in October 2021 to determine clinical relevance according to clinical guidelines' recommendations. Clinical relevance was completed by determining if pharmacy prescribing medications were part of a homogeneous therapeutic class (no differences in efficacy and safety considered in clinical guidelines, but rather inter-molecular differences) that included an OTC medication. To identify the most clinically relevant pharmacy prescribing medications, first-line treatments were considered. The implementation into daily practice in Swiss community pharmacies was evaluated through an online questionnaire distributed via e-mail from the national pharmacists' association and LinkedIn®. It included 15 questions divided in: pharmacy demographics, experience on pharmacy prescribing, use of prescribing medications and opinion about the them. Results: Of the 105 pharmacy prescribing medications, 20 (19.0%) were first-line treatments without OTC equivalences. Six of them were OTCs reclassified for safety reasons. Ten medications (9.5%) showed a negative clinical relevance (they were not first-line therapeutic options to support pharmacist when managing patients or considered as to be avoided) compared to the OTCs available. For the questionnaire, 283 pharmacists from the German (40.3%), French (37.1%) and Italian-speaking regions (16.9%) answered. In the previous 6 months, 41.7% pharmacies had delivered 10-50 medications and 30.0% between 1 and 10 medications. In situations where patients could be equally treated with a pharmacy prescribing medication or OTC (with an identical OTC, similar OTC or an OTC for the same therapeutic group): 75.6%, 74.9% and 84.8% of pharmacists, respectively, would have chosen OTCs because it required less documentation and it did not require patients' payment for the service. In addition, pharmacists' lack of training was also mentioned as barrier for providing the service. Conclusion: Most pharmacist prescribing medications do not present clinical advantages compared to OTCs. In addition, other barriers for implementation were also pharmacists' training and patient medications costs.

Strengthening patients' triage in community pharmacies: A cluster randomised controlled trial to evaluate the clinical impact of a minor ailment service.

BACKGROUND: Self-perceived minor ailments might conceal other health conditions if patients are not appropriately assisted by health care professionals. The aim of the study was to evaluate the patient-related outcomes of a community pharmacy Minor Ailment Service (MAS) compared to usual pharmacist care (UC). METHODS: A cluster randomised controlled trial was conducted over six months in community pharmacy in the province of Valencia (Spain). Patients seeking care or requesting a product for a minor ailments considered in the study (dermatological problems, gastrointestinal disturbance, pain and upper respiratory tract related symptoms) were included. The intervention consisted of a standardised pharmacist-patient consultation guided by a web-based program using co-developed management protocols and patients' educational material. Patients were followed up by phone ten days later. Primary clinical outcomes were appropriate medical referral and modification of direct product request. Secondary outcomes were symptom resolution and reconsultation rates. RESULTS: A total of 808 patients (323 MAS and 485 UC) were recruited in 27 pharmacies of 21 municipalities. Patients visiting MAS pharmacies had higher odds for being referred to a physician (OR = 2.343, CI95% = [1.146-4.792]) and higher reconsultation rates (OR = 1.833, CI95% = [1.151-2.919]) compared to UC. No significant differences between groups were observed for modification of direct product request and symptom resolution. CONCLUSIONS: The use of management protocols through the MAS strengthened the identification of referral criteria such as red flags in patients suffering minor ailments. These patients with symptoms of minor ailments possibly due to more severe illness were to be referred and evaluated by physicians. Results reinforce that MAS increases safety for those patients consulting in community pharmacy for minor ailments. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Trial registration number: ISRCTN17235323. Retrospectively registered 07/05/2021, https://www.isrctn.com/ISRCTN17235323.

Un nuevo camino en la Atención Farmacéutica: la idoneidad de la Evaluación Clínica Objetiva Estructurada / A new path in Pharmaceutical Care: the fitness of Objective Structured Clinical Evaluation

Introducción: la Evaluación Clínica Objetiva Estructurada (ECOE) es una de las herramientas más novedosas y con mejores resultados en la evaluación de competencias clínicas. Su uso en Farmacia constituye una oportunidad para innovar y mejorar el proceso de enseñanza-aprendizaje. Método: el proceso de implementación se estructuró en dos etapas: 1) Fase de preparación, que incluyó el diseño teórico de la prueba ECOE con tres componentes clave (Comité Organizador, Mapa de Competencias y Tabla de Especificaciones y Selección de Casos y Diseño de Estaciones) y la planificación práctica con el montaje de la prueba; 2) Fase de ejecución y evaluación de resultados. Resultados: el estudio piloto se desarrolló en la Facultad de Farmacia de la Universidad de Granada, España en el curso 2018-2019, y participaron 33 estudiantes de AF de Grado y 14 estudiantes de Máster en AF. Se evaluaron cinco competencias: Clínica, Técnica, Servicios Farmacéuticos Asistenciales, Comunicación y Actividades Educativas, distribuidas en cinco estaciones, tres de paciente simulado estandarizado y dos estaciones escritas. Se identificaron los recursos materiales, humanos y económicos necesarios, se elaboraron los documentos de cada estación y se seleccionaron y entrenaron los participantes. Conclusiones: la prueba ECOE es una herramienta útil e idónea para evaluar las competencias específicas de Atención Farmacéutica. El procedimiento descrito y los elementos clave identificados facilitan la implantación de este tipo de pruebas innovadoras en Farmacia. (AU)

Introduction: Objective Structured Clinical Evaluation (OSCE) is a novel and best-performing tool in the evaluation of clinical competencies. Its use in Pharmacy represents an opportunity to innovate and improve the teaching-learning process. Method: The implementation process was structured in two stages: 1) Preparation phase, which included the theoretical design and practical planning of the OSCE test with three key components (Organizing Committee, Map of Competencies and Table of Specifications and Selection of Cases and Design of Stations) and the practical planning with the assembly of the test; 2) Phase of execution and evaluation of results. Results: The pilot study was carried out at the School of Pharmacy (University of Granada, Spain) in the 2018-2019 academic year, and 33 undergraduate students and 14 Master students participated. Five competencies were evaluated: Clinical, Technical, Pharmaceutical Services, Communication and Educational activities, delivered in five stations, three with simulated standardized patients and two written stations. Material, human and economic resources were identified. The necessary material, human and economic resources were identified, the documents for each station were prepared and the participants were selected and trained. Conclusions: OSCE is a suitable and great tool for evaluating the specific competencies of Pharmaceutical Care. The procedure and key elements identified facilitate the implementation of this type of innovative tests in Pharmacy. (AU)

A cost utility analysis alongside a cluster-randomised trial evaluating a minor ailment service compared to usual care in community pharmacy.

BACKGROUND: Minor ailments are "self-limiting conditions which may be diagnosed and managed without a medical intervention". A cluster randomised controlled trial (cRCT) was designed to evaluate the clinical, humanistic and economic outcomes of a Minor Ailment Service (MAS) in community pharmacy (CP) compared with usual care (UC). METHODS: The cRCT was conducted for 6 months from December 2017. The pharmacist-patient intervention consisted of a standardised face-to-face consultation on a web-based program using co-developed protocols, pharmacists' training, practice change facilitators and patients' educational material. Patients requesting a non-prescription medication (direct product request) or presenting minor ailments received MAS or UC and were followed-up by telephone 10-days after the consultation. The primary economic outcomes were incremental cost-utility ratio (ICUR) of the service and health related quality of life (HRQoL). Total costs included health system, CPs and patient direct costs: health professionals' consultation time, medication costs, pharmacists' training costs, investment of the pharmacy and consultation costs within the 10 days following the initial consultation. The HRQoL was obtained using the EuroQoL 5D-5L at the time of the consultation and at 10-days follow up. A sensitivity analysis was carried out using bootstrapping. There were two sub-group analyses undertaken, for symptom presentation and direct product requests, to evaluate possible differences. RESULTS: A total of 808 patients (323 MAS and 485 UC) were recruited in 27 CPs with 42 pharmacists (20 MAS and 22 UC). 64.7% (n = 523) of patients responded to follow-up after their consultation in CP. MAS patients gained an additional 0.0003 QALYs (p = 0.053). When considering only MAS patients presenting with symptoms, the ICUR was 24,733€/QALY with a 47.4% probability of cost-effectiveness (willingness to pay of 25,000€/QALY). Although when considering patients presenting for a direct product request, MAS was the dominant strategy with a 93.69% probability of cost-effectiveness. CONCLUSIONS: Expanding community pharmacists' scope through MAS may benefit health systems. To be fully cost effective, MAS should not only include consultations arising from symptom presentation but also include an oversight of self-selected products by patients. MAS increase patient safety through the appropriate use of non-prescription medication and through the direct referral of patients to GP. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN, ISRCTN17235323 . Registered 07/05/2021 - Retrospectively registered.

Colaboración farmacéutico-médico en la elaboración de protocolos consensuados para el tratamiento de síntomas menores: programa 'INDICA+PRO' / Collaborative care protocols for the management of minor ailments agreed between pharmacists and medical practitioners: INDICA+PRO Study

Introducción: la colaboración entre médicos y farmacéuticos es necesaria en el manejo de los síntomas menores, ya que el paciente acude a ambos profesionales sanitarios para su tratamiento. El objetivo del estudio fue elaborar protocolos de trabajo consensuados entre farmacéuticos comunitarios y médicos de atención primaria para el Servicio de Indicación Farmacéutica (SIF). Material y método: se utilizaron dos metodologías: revisión bibliográfica y grupo de expertos para el consenso. Estos protocolos se actualizaron y diseñaron a partir de un documento previo de 2008. En el grupo de expertos se incluyeron cuatro farmacéuticos comunitarios de SEFAC (2), MICOF (2) y cuatro médicos de atención primaria de semFYC (2) y SEMERGEN (2). Resultados: se consensuaron protocolos de trabajo para 31 síntomas menores distribuidos en cinco grupos: respiratorios, dolor moderado, digestivos, dermatológicos y otros. Se añadieron cinco síntomas nuevos al documento de partida. Respecto a la estructura de cada síntoma se consideró: concepto, causas más frecuentes, criterios de derivación al médico (edad, síntomas de alarma, duración de los síntomas, otros problemas de salud y/o medicamentos y situaciones especiales), recomendaciones para la prevención y tratamiento (no farmacológico y farmacológico). Conclusión: el documento desarrollado mediante colaboración entre profesionales de la medicina y la farmacia es una herramienta que contribuye a la mejora de la actuación del farmacéutico en el manejo de los síntomas menores desde la farmacia comunitaria, con énfasis en la definición de indicadores que señalan la necesidad de derivar el paciente al médico de atención primaria

Background: To increase the collaboration between community pharmacists and medical practitioners working in primary care it is critical to have collaborative protocols in place. Minor ailments could be a good example where this collaboration would benefit patient care as patients are seeking treatment in both settings. These collaborative protocols would assist in diminishing the variability of treatments in both settings. The aim of the study was to develop care protocols for minor ailments agreed between medical practitioners and pharmacists Methods: Two different methodologies were used to arrive at a consensus for the proto-cols: literature review and expert group. Some of the clinical protocols were updated from a previous document created in 2008. Expert group was composed of four community pharma-cists (SEFAC, MICOF) and four medical practitioners (SemFyC y Semergen). Results: Thirty-one protocols for minor ailments were agreed and allocated to five groups (five new minor ailments protocols were added: respiratory tract-related conditions, gastrointestinal disturbance, pain, dermatological problems and others.Protocols were structured following: definition, more frequent causes, referral criteria (pa-tient’s age, red flags, symptom’s duration, patient’s health problems and treatments and physiological situations), recommendations for management (prevention, non-pharmacological and pharmacological treatment) and references used. Conclusions: Clinical protocols agreed between health professionals of medicine and phar-macy are a tool that contribute to better management of minor ailments in community pharmacy

La información al paciente sobre los servicios profesionales farmacéuticos asistenciales de farmacia comunitaria / Information to patients on professional pharmaceutical care services of Community Pharmacy

La prestación de servicios profesionales farmacéuticos asistenciales (SPFA) al paciente des-de la farmacia comunitaria ha de realizarse observando una serie de garantías sanitarias y legales previas que aseguren los derechos del paciente. Toda actuación en el ámbito de la salud de un paciente necesita su consentimiento libre y voluntario una vez que haya recibido la in-formación adecuada. Esta información que, como regla general, se proporcionará verbalmente (salvo en los casos de procedimientos invasivos, que son los que entrañan riesgos más graves), ha de ser veraz e incluir como mínimo la finalidad y la naturaleza de cada intervención, sus riesgos y sus consecuencias, y se debe comunicar al paciente de forma comprensible y adaptada a sus necesidades, de forma que le ayude a tomar decisiones de acuerdo con su propia y libre voluntad. De este modo, para que el paciente consienta que se le preste un SPFA ha de recibir previamente una información específica sobre dicho servicio. Aunque esta información se po-dría proporcionar solo verbalmente, al ser los SPFA servicios novedosos con los que el paciente no está familiarizado, es recomendable proporcionarla también por escrito ya que esta vía per-mite garantizar que se comunica de forma uniforme, comprensible, evitando equivocaciones y olvidos, y además el paciente tendrá más tiempo para estudiarla en su casa. Este artículo analiza la información mínima que se debe proporcionar a los pacientes y usuarios en la prestación de los SPFA. Además, muestra como ejemplo tanto la información que se proporciona al paciente en cinco de los SPFA que gestiona la aplicación SEFAC e_XPERT®, como un modelo de consen-timiento informado válido para dichos servicios y que incluye el resto de información necesaria que también se debe comunicar previamente al paciente

The provision of professional pharmaceutical care services (SPFA) to the patient from the community pharmacy must be carried out by observing a series of previous health and legal guarantees that ensure the rights of the patient. Any action in the area of a patient’s health requires his or her free and voluntary consent once he or she had received the appropriate information. This information will, as a general rule, be provided orally (except in the case of invasive procedures, which are the ones with the most serious risks), must be truthful and include at least the purpose and nature of each intervention, its risks and its consequences, and must be communicated to the patient in a way that is understandable and adapted to his or her needs, in a way that helps you make decisions according to your own free will. Thus, in order for the patient to consent to the provision of an SPFA, he must first receive specific information about that service. Although this information could be provided only verbally, as SPFAs are novel services with which the patient is not familiar, it’s advisable to provide it also in writing, as this way ensures that it communicates uniformly, comprehensively, avoiding mistakes and forgetfulness, and also that the patient will have more time to study it at home. This article discusses the minimum information to be provided to patients and users in the provision of SPFA. In addition, it shows, as an example, the information provided to the patient in five of the SPFA that manage the SEFAC e_XPERT®application, as well as an informed consent model which includes all other necessary information which must also be communicated to patient

Elaboración de una guía de Seguimiento Farmacoterapéutico en el paciente con epilepsia / Development of a medication review with follow-up guide on patients with epilepsy

Objetivo: Elaborar una guía práctica de seguimiento farmacoterapéutico (SFT) en el paciente con epilepsia tras el análisis de la información disponible, dirigida a todos los profesionales sanitarios involucrados en la atención del paciente, centrada en el farmacéutico comunitario. Método: Se llevó a cabo una revisión bibliográfica con fecha límite del 15 de junio de 2017. La estrategia de búsqueda consistió en una revisión de fuentes prefiltradas de evidencia en epilepsia, guías de Atención Farmacéutica y Seguimiento Farmacoterapéutico, libros de farmacología humana y dispensación de medicamentos, bases de datos de evidencia científica y bases de datos del medicamento. Resultados: Durante la realización del SFT en el paciente con epilepsia, se debe evaluar el tratamiento mediante la presencia de indicadores de necesidad (existencia del problema de salud que justifica su uso), efectividad (ausencia o disminución del número de crisis epilépticas) y seguridad (ausencia de efectos adversos, contraindicaciones e interacciones). Todo ello para diseñar una estrategia de intervención con el paciente y/o el resto de los profesionales sanitarios involucrados con el fin de mejorar la calidad de vida del paciente. Conclusiones: Esta guía pretende ser un recurso útil para el farmacéutico comunitario en la realización del SFT en el paciente con epilepsia, puesto que contiene toda la información necesaria acerca de la enfermedad y los tratamientos empleados. Siempre considerando al paciente como una unidad, no fraccionado en función de sus problemas de salud

Aim: Prepare a document to conduct medication review with follow-up of patients diagnosed with epilepsy. This document is been addressed to every health professional who take care of the patient, especially to community pharmacists. Method: A literature review has been performed over the available resources until 15 June 2017. The search strategy considers sources of evidence in epilepsy, pharmaceutical care and medication review with follow-up guides, human pharmacology and dispensing books, drugs databases and scientific evidence databases. Results: In the application of the medication review with follow-up of patients with epilepsy, the treatment should be assessed through indicators of necessity (existence of a health problem that justifies the use of anticonvulsants), effectiveness (absence or decrease of the number of epileptic seizures) and safety (absence of adverse reactions, contraindications and interactions). This allows the appropriate co-design of an intervention strategy in collaboration with the patient and/or other health-care providers to improve the patients’ quality of life. Conclusions: This guide includes detailed information about the epilepsy and the treatments used by considering the patient as a unit and not divided according to their health problems. Therefore, this guide could be a useful tool tailored to those pharmacists involved in the medication review with follow-up of patients with epilepsy